by Steven D
Tue Nov 17th, 2009 at 07:35:32 AM EST

The "economy" isn’t what its all about. Stock
prices can rise, Goldman Sachs can give out bonuses galore,
productivity can shoot through the roof, but until we start getting
people back their jobs — good paying jobs — we are headed to Nowheresville. And for millions of people that means they go not only without work, but WITHOUT ENOUGH FOOD (and, yes, some things do require all caps):

(cont.)

WASHINGTON — The number of U.S. households that are
struggling to feed their members jumped by 4 million to 17 million last
year, as recession-fueled job losses and increased poverty and
unemployment fueled a surge in hunger, a government survey reported
Monday.

These "food-insecure" households represent about 49 million people and
make up 14.6 percent, or more than one in seven, of all U.S.
households. That’s the highest rate since the U.S. Department of
Agriculture began monitoring the issue in 1995.
Additionally, more than one-third of these struggling families — some
6.7 million households, or 17.2 million people last year — had "very
low food security," in which food intake was reduced and eating
patterns were disrupted for some family members because of a lack of
food.

This is something the likes of Lou Dobbs and Glenn Beck and Rush
Limbaugh with all their talent on loan from Satan will never
understand, nor likely care about. After all, the gull enough people
into listening to them babble lies and cry on cue and scream racially
divisive rants into their microphones, (or make senior executives of
major media outlets so sick of their bile that they throw millions of
dollars at them just to go away and not to work) not to have to concern themselves with the needs of "people looking for government handouts" (to use their own words).

Nor are our elite class of pundits and politicians and lobbyists likely
to get it, and by "it" I mean what it’s like to decide if you have
enough money to pay the rent and make the peanut butter and bread last
long enough until either your next unemployment check comes or your
savings runs out.

I’ve been there, back in the early 80’s, the last time unemployment was
this bad, and I can’t tell you how gut wrenching it is to see what
little money you have drain away on a one room studio apartment in the
attic of a converted house, unable to afford milk to wash those thinly
spread peanut butter sandwiches down while you desperately look for a
job each and every day. I was single, however. I can’t even imagine the
anguish that many parents today (literally today, folks) must go
through when they have to deny their kids a decent meal. And I’m not
talking healthy food necessarily. Just any food.

In phone interviews, more than two-thirds of people
with very low food security said they went hungry from time to time,
and 27 percent of these adults said they didn’t eat at all some days.
[…]

[Agriculture Secretary Tom] Vilsack said the findings were consistent
with the nation’s dire economic climate and that next year’s report
probably would show a worsening situation due to continued job losses
and rising unemployment.

Vilsack said the findings from the annual USDA survey of 44,000 households were a "wake-up call for America."

One in seven people in America who are "food insecure" (and what a
euphemism that is, right up there with "collateral damage" for
detaching reality from raw meaning), and of that number, sixty-six
point six – six – six (ad infinitum) percent who go hungry, with nearly another third who go without eating anything period on many days.

You know what I think? These are people ripe for the promises of
demagogues, liars, propagandist and "rogues" who are and will be more
than happy to tell them who is responsible for their misery. People who
are ripe for finding scapegoats. And I know where they will find them.
You do, too.

This news ought to increasingly worry Democrats, especially those Blue
Dog Democrats and Conservative Democrats and weak kneed Democrats, and
any other Democrats (even if only in name) who are afraid to spend
federal money to create jobs — now because Republicans will run
"attack ads" against them. Well I’ll let all those democrats in
Congress in on a little secret, (and I’m only talking to those who
oppose more stimulus money for anything) The Republicans are going to
run those attack ads anyway, so you better have some bullets to fire
back at them.
Because the longer people go without jobs, and the longer they go
hungry, the more the table is set (no pun intended) for massive losses
for Dems in Congress next year when these folks either blame them for
the fact that they can’t find jobs or feed themselves and their kids
properly, or they will simply stay away from the polls and not vote.
The GOP won’t need to suppress voter turnout. Inaction to address this
fundamental inequity in our society will do that for them.

One thing we know for sure: people without jobs, people who are
skipping meals so their kids can eat, or because they just don’t have
the money, won’t be spending any hard earned dollars on campaign
contributions, because they won’t have any to spend. So my message to
Congressional Dems that oppose more stimulus spending is this: Vote for
the money and programs necessary to increase employment or lose your
job. If you don’t, it’s your own funeral.

Advertisements