The Importance of Finding Your Securitization Documents

Posted on May 28, 2010 by Neil Garfield – LivingLies dot wordpress dot com

See special-offer-on-getting-securitization-report-on-your-mortgages

Jake is a former player in the trading of debt securities, so he knows what he is talking about. Here he writes about the PSA (Pooling and Service Agreement). The process he now goes through is tedious and sometimes inconclusive, but he gets about as close as anyone can under the current circumstances.

Matt Weidner is obviously one of the better lawyers who “gets it.”

The new service that we have launched and which is being tested thoroughly this weekend, takes the guess work out of it, gives you the right pointers, access to the right documents and a  commentary from me, Jake and other experts on our panel on what the salient points are that you might use in your battle against the pretender lender.

See special-offer-on-getting-securitization-report-on-your-mortgages

Submitted by Jake Naumer
Finding Pooling and Servicing Agreements is Key to
Killing Your Foreclosure Case!
Jake Naumer Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:47 AM

Finding Pooling and Servicing Agreements is Key to Killing Your
Foreclosure Case! Today, May 28, 2010, 40 minutes ago | Matthew D. Weidner, Esq.
If you’re being sued by any entity acting as a trustee, i.e. “US BANK
as trustee for the HP Series 2006-c Certificate Holders”, you need to
be aware of a variety of issues that may be helpful in your case. 

I will start another series of video blog posts on the “Capacity
Argument”, because this argument works in nearly every case, but it is
particularly appropriate in cases where Plaintiff is an exotic, alphabet soup Foreclosure Frankenstein. 

Individual mortgages originated by lenders like New Century and Argent
were pooled into groups of approximately 8,000 mortgages from around
the country to form a Mortgage Trust which held mortgages which had
(on paper at least) cumulative values of between 10-12 million
dollars. These mortgages that were grouped together and given a name
Interests in these mortgage trusts were then sold to teachers unions,
investment funds and other institutional sources around the world.
Before selling the interests in these trusts, the institutional
investors were required to prepare the contract that would govern the
rights between the depositor of the mortgages, trustee of the new
trust and the company that would be responsible for collecting
payments from homeowners and sending those payments out to those who
had invested in the trust. This contract is called the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement. 

The important thing about the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is you 

will find in virtually every case that all of the parties who are involved violate 

nearly every provision of their own Pooling and Servicing Agreement. 

This has important consequences that we will talk more about later, but the 

Securities and Exchange Commission rules requires these trusts to provide

important other reporting information that was widely ignored or worse, 

falsified by the entities in control of these trusts. Finding such information can be 

a key to defending your case. The Securities and Exchange Commission Edgar 

Database can be found here. You can also put the name of your Frakenstein, 

Alphabet Soup Trust into quotes, “The IXIX 2006-A Trust” into a straight google search and 

see what comes up. Here are Step-By-Step instructions: Finding Pooling And Servicing Agreements (PSA’s)

For Securitized Mortgage Loans The “Pooling and Servicing Agreement” is the legal document that contains 

the 5/28/2010 Gmail – Finding Pooling and Servicing A…… 1/5 responsibilities 

and rights of the servicer, the trustee, and others over a pool of mortgage loans. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement 

can be a stand-alone document or it can be part of another paper, usually called the “Prospectus.” If the securitization 

is public, these documents must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and will be available to 

the public at Locating a Pooling and Servicing Agreement on the SEC website can be a challenge. 

The most important information you will need to find the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is the name of the original lender 

and the title of the pool of loans. We will work through an example below. Assume that the lender is Ameriquest Mortgage Co. 

We don’t know the name of the pool that the homeowner’s mortgage ended up in, but we do know that the mortgage was made 

on June 1, 2002.

Step One:
Go to and click on “Search for Company Filings” under
“Filing & Forms
(EDGAR).” Under “General-Purpose Searches,” click on “Companies &
other filers.”

Then, in the “Enter your search information” box, type in “Ameriquest”
next to “Company name” and click on the “Find Companies” button.

Step Two:
The page you are now looking at shows a long list of the names of
securitized pools of
loans. We know the mortgage was made on June 1, 2002. Look for the
entry titled

document number is CIK 0001175125. Click on that number. We selected
this entry because it said 2002 on it and the loan in question was made in 2002.
There may be several other pools of mortgage loans that Ameriquest securitized in
2002 but this is the first one we come to on this list (when reviewed in late February
2007) so we will pull it up.

Step Three:
Now you see a list of documents filed with the SEC that are related to
this pool of loans. Scroll down to the bottom and you will see a document titled
“Prospectus.” This is the document that will likely be the one you want, assuming that the
mortgage loan you are concerned about is in this pool. We can only make an educated guess,
unless you know the name of the securitized pool in advance (which is unlikely). 

5/28/2010 Gmail – Finding Pooling and Servicing A…… 2/5
on either “htm or text” next to this document and the Prospectus will appear. 

Now, bookmark this document on your web browser, so you can come back to it
easily in the future.

Step Four
Is this likely to be the document you want? Scroll down to page S-2
and you will see a Table of Contents. Included in that is the “Pooling and Servicing
Agreement” which starts on page S-76. Also, scroll down one more page, past the Table
of Contents, and you will see a “Summary of Prospectus Supplement.” Certain important
information is listed there, including the cut-off and closing dates for loans that
will be included in this pool. The closing date is June 7, 2002. 

Based on this information, you can assume that this document governs the responsibilities of the servicer of the
mortgage loan in question, unless that servicer tells you otherwise and can back it up with a reference to a different agreement or pool. 

Other important information listed in this Summary includes the title of the pool, and the identity of the servicer and trustee. 

The servicing rights may have been sold since this document was filed and the current servicer may be a different company
but the trustee (the legal holder of the mortgage) should be accurate.

Step Five:
Go the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to find what you need to know. It should
describe how the servicer is paid and by how much, who keeps late and
other fees, what authority it has to modify the loan or engage in workouts with
homeowners, and its obligations to pass mortgage payments on to the trustee.
Some of the best information I get comes from intrepid consumer
researchers out there who care enough to dig into these things.

Perhaps the most powerful thing about this and other online forums is
the ability for consumers and advocates to share what they’ve found.
In my estimation, what this pro-se Defendant found is enough to blow
the lid off his foreclosure on:

I was served Lis Pendens last month, (April 2010), naming the
plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee for HSI
I looked into the records for that entity in the SEC EDGAR online
5/28/2010 Gmail – Finding Pooling and Servicing A…… 3/5 database and discovered that the 

last annual report was filed in 2007, contemporaneously with a FORM 15 filing.

That Form 15 filing claimed a standing under 15d-6 of the 1934 SEC regulations 

which exempts the entity of filing an annual report, whereby the number of claimed
investors had fallen below the SEC registration and reporting
threshold of 300 persons. ( To my understanding, the same Form 15
filing is also used when a registered, reporting, entity is

I then began looking at many other securitized trusts in the EDGAR
database. Literally dozens and dozens of these securitized trusts have
done exactly the same thing. he trust is established and appropriate
SEC documents are filed for a period of time, usually 1 or 2 years.
The trust then files a Form 15 claiming exemption of the obligation to
file reports with the SEC under 15d-6
The paper trail for the Trust with the SEC thereby *ends* Many of
these trusts have not filed anything with the SEC for years. Many as
far back as 2005 and 2006
Some of the SEC Form 15d-6 filings disclosed as few as 15 or less
investors. Bear in mind, these are for trusts that purportedly hold
well over $1 BILLION in mortgages, and there are dozens and dozens of
these trusts with a mere hand full of investors! I also noted that the
“agent of record” of many of these trusts have changed many times, and
are very infrequently “named”, but list only an address and phone
number, (usually in New York). In several of the cases I’ve looked at
in the EDGAR database, I actually called some of the phone number
listed at 3:00am EST and got the voicemail of someone at a bank in
N.Y. Note that the answering party was NEVER a bank listed as the
Trustee, (as Deutsche Bank is in my case), or the trust
“administrator” as listed in the PSA or any subsequent SEC filings.
I actually got the voicemail of some fellow at HSBC Bank who was the
“anonymous” contact in my case! My point is this;
Has anyone actually verified that the securitized trusts claimed to be
under the trusteeship of some of these banks still ACTUALLY EXIST?
We’ve been so focused on the NOTE and the fraudulent paper being slung
about for assignment of those notes, and whether or not the
“plaintiff” has standing to bring the foreclosure action, has anyone
thought to see if the “plaintiff trust” is even still active or not?
Were many of these trusts actually dissolved after payouts from credit
default swaps and TARP funds and the actual investors now long gone?
We have no records to show whether they are alive or dead. Most of
these trusts haven’t filed anything with anyone in years as far as I
can tell.

Certainly, as in my case, Deutsche Bank, (as Trustee), still exists,
but can these plaintiff securitized trusts be made to *prove* they
still exist?

What happens to a foreclosure case if the plaintiff entity,(the
securitized trust, *not* the Trustee for it), no longer exists or
cannot prove it exists?

5/28/2010 Gmail – Finding Pooling and Servicing A…… 4/5



Jake Naumer Union Capital
Licensed Financial Advisor
3187 Morgan Ford
St Louis Missouri 63116
314 961 7600
Fax Voice Mail 314 754 9086
5/28/2010 Gmail – Finding Pooling and Servicing A…… 5/5

Filed under: foreclosure